Posted by
Az Dave on Friday, April 20, 2007 12:48:57 PM
First, what is Partial Birth Abortion?
For those that do not know, it is when a BABY(not fetus) is partially delivered and then stabbed in the back of the skull and killed. Thus the conservative title called "Partial Birth Abortion".
Why are liberals crying about this Supreme court ruling when they say it represents only a handful of cases every year?
I don't know you should ask them. Even though the numbers on both sides of this issue are extremely different.
Why should the ban on this procedure not include a protection clause for the life of the mother?
Because there are still other procedures available to the mother to abort her BABY.
What makes Partial Birth Abortion not equal to murder?
Nothing! Only the fact that since the BABY (not fetus), is not completely out of the birth canal and crying in someones hands yet. Liberals and pro abortion advocates believe the procedure should be allowed and legal.
What makes any doctor who performs this precedure any diffferent then someone named Cho Seung-Hui?
I don't know you tell me. All I do know is in the end Cho kills himself when he is through with his "debauchery "or should I say debutchery.
Much kudos goes out to the Supreme Court and George W. Bush for this small victory against "Liberal Infanticide" the scourage of this great nation.
While I think Abortion is a very tough issue. I do know that my family and I would never even consider such a thing. So why then, would I support someone's supposed right to use government tax money to murder an innocent unborn child when we have so many birth control options and even adoption available?
This just does not make sense to me one bit as a human being who is thankful that I was Not Aborted, even while others may wish I would have been.
Az Dave out!